| Model Number |
G56221 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Separation (1562)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
| Date of Event |
04/18/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Occupation: non-healthcare professional.Pma/510(k) number - pre-amendment.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted at the conclusion of the investigation or, when additional relevant information becomes available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported, during preparation, the flexor high-flex ansel guiding sheath pulled apart while forming a tip with a 4 x 4 wipe.The device never made patient contact.No patient care was impacted.The procedure was able to be completed successfully with another device and with good patient outcome.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Investigation ¿ evaluation.Reviews of the dimensional verification, complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturer¿s instructions, quality control, and a visual inspection of the returned device were conducted during the investigation.The visual inspection of the returned package confirmed that one kcfw-6.0-35-70-rb-hfanl0-hc with the dilator fully inserted through the proximal fitting was returned for investigation.There was no biological matter on the sheath or dilator.The sheath material was separated at 57.4cm from the proximal hub.There was 1.2cm of exposed coiling connecting the proximal segment to the distal segment.The distal segment was 12.4cm long.There was no other damage noted on the sheath tubing.Additionally, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.A review of the device history record showed no nonconforming events which could contribute to this failure mode.It should also be noted there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Furthermore, reviews of the manufacturer¿s instructions, drawings, specifications, and quality control procedures were conducted, and no gaps were discovered.Based on the information provided and the examination of the returned product, investigation has concluded that this event was likely caused by unintended use error.We will continue our monitoring of similar complaints and have notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No new patient or event information to report.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This mdr is being submitted as having information not previously reported.Additional complaint investigation and record remediation was not performed.Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.Corrected information: g5.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|