Catalog Number 1120350-38 |
Device Problems
Material Separation (1562); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Failure to Advance (2524); Difficult to Advance (2920); Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 04/15/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.(b)(4).The device is expected to be returned for investigation.It has not yet been received.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a heavily calcified, chronic total occlusion, mid right coronary artery that was 99% stenosed.The 3.50x38mm rx xience alpine stent delivery catheter (sds) failed to cross due to anatomy and an interaction with another unspecified device.Force was applied and the proximal shaft separated.After removal, it was noted that the mid portion of the stent implant had bent struts.Pre-dilatation was done with two non-abbott balloons (2.75x15mm, 3.0x15mm) then an unspecified stent was implanted to successfully complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal file number: (b)(4).Evaluation summary: a visual and dimensional inspection was performed on the returned device.The reported material deformation and shaft detachment were confirmed.The reported failure to advance and difficult to position could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.It should be noted that the xience alpine everolimus eluting coronary stent system (eecss), domestic electronic instructions for use, states: if unusual resistance is felt before the stent exits the guiding catheter, do not force passage.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to the operational context of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|