|
Investigation evaluation: our laboratory evaluation of the product said to be involved could not confirm the report as it was described, because all of the device components (particularly the clip) were not included in the return.During a functional test, the device was advanced into an olympus gif q20 2.8 mm channel endoscope in a simulated upper gastrointestinal (gi) position with the tip in the maximum retroflexed position to simulate a worst case position.With handle manipulation, the drive wire moved freely inside the outer sheath.A visual examination of the drive wire hook, catheter attachment, and coil catheter (distal end device components) showed no deformities or signs of damage.A product discrepancy or anomaly that could have contributed to the reported occurrence was not observed.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: a definitive cause for this observation could not be determined because the actual use conditions could not be duplicated in the laboratory setting.This was due, in part, to the fact that the clip was not included with the return.In addition, due to a variety of clinical conditions such as patient anatomy, endoscope position or progression of disease state, we could not reproduce the actual conditions of product usage during our laboratory analysis.This limits our ability to conclusively determine a cause.The instructions for use state: "with clip closed and without holding handle spool, advance device in small increments into accessory channel of gastroscope or colonoscope.Caution: holding handle spool during advancement may prematurely deploy clip." the instructions for use also include the following precaution: "endoscope must remain as straight as possible when inserting or withdrawing device." prior to distribution, all instinct endoscopic hemoclips are subjected to a visual inspection and functional testing to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.The likelihood of occurrence is considered rare.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|
|
During a hemostasis procedure, the physician used an instinct endoscopic hemoclips.The clip deployed prematurely inside the patient.It is unknown if the clip deployed in the open or closed position.It was reported that the clip detached in the patient in an unknown position.However, our attempts to collect additional information regarding patient outcome were unsuccessful.While the complainant did not specify if the patient experienced any adverse effects or required additional medical procedures due to this event, the information able to be collected does not reasonably suggest the patient was adversely impacted.
|