| Model Number |
03.111.501 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Fitting Problem (2183); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Device Difficult to Maintain (3134)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
| Date of Event |
04/05/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.A review of the device history records has been requested.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2019, a 3 hole shaft variable angle locking compression plate (va-lcp) distal radius two column 6hh narrow was used.The surgeon attempted to insert one (1) cortex screw self-tapping with t8 stardrive recess 18mm through the 6 hole guiding block.The screw would not fit through the guide.Other screws were tried.Two (2) additional cortex screw self-tapping with t8 stardrive recess 18mm would not fit through the guide and finally one did.There was a 5 minutes surgical delay.Procedure was successfully completed.The patient was not affected.Concomitant device reported: 3 hole shaft variable angle locking compression plate (va-lcp) (part #unknown, lot # unknown, quantity # 1).This complaint involves four (4) devices.This report if for one (1) guide block for two-column plate/narrow 6h hd/lt.This report is 3 of 4 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.(b)(4).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.A device history record (dhr) review was conducted: part: 03.111.501.Lot: 8805348.Manufacturing site: hägendorf.Release to warehouse date: 23.June 2014.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.A product investigation was conducted.Visual inspection: the guide block was visually inspected.Light surface wear, consistent with use and which would not impact the functionality, was noted.However, no defects were identified on guide block.Functional test: functional test was performed via returned mating device.It was confirmed that all the screws and all the mating grooves of guide block were not fitting.The condition was determined to agree with the complaint description as the cortex screw and mating guide are not intended to fit.The relevant drawings for the mating device were reviewed; dimensional analysis: the variable angle lcp two -column volar distal radius plate 2.4 technique guide (036.000.578, dsem/trm/0815/0464 09/15) and the 2.4mm variable angle lcp distal radius system technique guide (dsus/trm/0515/0599 6/15) were reviewed and it was confirmed that cortex screws are not intended to be placed through the guide block.Therefore dimensional analysis was not performed for guide block.Based on design investigation the original complaint and investigation focused on the surgeon attempting to insert a cortex screw through a guide block for two column plate.This section of the two column plate family that receives the guide block for neutral angle screw placement contains va-lcp holes.These holes do not correlate with the usage of cortex screws.The surgical technique for the us and eu both define the usage of threaded locking head implants with the use of the guide block.The surgeon, in this case, is using a screw/plate combination that is not indicated for this particular combination and therefore the complaint can be categorized as user error.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|