| Model Number |
25135 |
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
04/15/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On completion of the investigation a follow up report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a flixene graft was implanted for a patient going on dialysis.The doctor could not hear or feel flow.It was cannulated in the operating room (or) and got blood return.The dialysis unit could not hear or feel flow.An ultrasound was done that showed complete occlusion of the graft.The patient had to go back to the or for explant of the graft.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Analysis: the details indicate that a flixene graft was implanted for a patient going on dialysis.The doctor could not hear or feel flow.It was cannulated in the operating room (or) and got blood return.The dialysis unit could not hear or feel flow.An ultrasound was done that showed complete occlusion of the graft.The patient had to go back to the or for explant of the graft.As we have not been provided any further information regarding this case after multiple attempts, an investigation into the reasons why the graft became completely occluded is difficult.There is a possibility that the patient may have had some coagulopathies.There is no mention in the case details if flow had been confirmed directly after implantation of the graft.Without more detail a root cause cannot be determined.Atrium medical corporation has made multiple attempts to obtain more information but a response was never received from the institution.A thorough review of the device history records for this graft lot was conducted.The device lot in question met all quality and performance testing requirements and no non-conformances were noted during the build of the product related to the complaint.Conclusion: based on the review of the device history records and product complaint details atrium medical corporation cannot conclude the occlusion was directly related to the flixene graft.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|