|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol kugel hernia patch on (b)(6) 2016.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device(s).As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard/davol kugel hernia patch.As reported, the attorney alleges patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol kugel hernia patch on (b)(6) 2016.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device(s).As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard/davol kugel hernia patch.As reported, the attorney alleges patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2016 ¿ patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of kugel patch (device 1).Per operative notes, ¿the fascial defects were identified.A large oval kugel patch (device 1) was placed into preperitoneal space and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2016 ¿ patient was diagnosed with hematoma thereby underwent open repair with the removal of mesh (device 1) and implant of kugel patch (device 2).Per operative notes, ¿the hematoma was evacuated, and the previously placed mesh (device 1) was removed.The kugel patch (device 2) was placed and sutured.¿.
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-nov-2015) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot no., udi no., expiry date), d.6b (date of explant), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10 note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : not returned.
|