| Catalog Number |
227355 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
03/18/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.(b)(4).As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by the affiliate in (b)(6) that during an unknown procedure the blade did not function.The procedure was completed with a second blade with no harm to the patient.During in-house engineering evaluation, it was determined that the suction tube on the device had residue.It was further determined that the device did not ablate nor coagulate.There was patient involvement reported.There were no injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Additional narrative: if information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the device was received and evaluated.The complaint can be confirmed.It was observed that the active tip of the device appeared activated and saline residue was present in the suction tubing indicating that the device had been previously used.The device was connected to a test generator to test the functionality of the device.The device was activated in both ablate and coagulate modes for several seconds, and neither were successfully activated.The device was forwarded to the manufacturer for further investigation into the observed failures.The manufacturer indicated that the active continuity of the device was out of specification.The handle of the devices was opened to further investigate the electrical defects.Upon opening it could be seen that the active wire had been trapped between the handle halves and sheared.The device as presented showed no active continuity.Root cause investigation has shown that the active wire had become trapped in the handle halves which resulted in the wire being sheared during the ultrasonic welding operation.A dhr review has been performed for the complaint device lot number u1712025; no issues (ncrs or deviations) with the manufacturing process have been indicated which might explain the failures observed.Therefore no containment or correction action related to the individual complaint is required.At this point, no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Udi: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|