| Catalog Number |
03.632.400 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
04/08/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device has been received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that on (b)(6) 2019, during a posterior spine fusion surgery with an unknown matrix 5.5 system at t8-t11 due to compression fracture, when the surgeon performed the final tightening of the screw, the screwdriver shaft broke off.The surgery was completed by using an alternative screwdriver shaft.The surgeon commented and suspected that it was due to a metal fatigue.There was a less than thirty (30) minutes surgical delay and no adverse consequence to the patient reported.Concomitant device reported: unknown screw (part #: unknown, lot #: unknown, quantity: 1).This report is for one (1) straight tip t25 driver standard.This is report 1 of 1 for complaint (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.A review of the device history records: part: 03.632.40.Lot: 7735359.Manufacturing site: hägendorf.Release to warehouse date: 27.March 2012.Investigation summary: investigation selection: investigation site: (b)(6).Selected flow: damaged ¿ broken (2+ pieces) intraoperatively.Visual inspection: the returned screwdriver shows that the tip of the instrument is broken as complained.The stardrive is in a used condition.Dimensional inspection: because of the damages, the complaint relevant dimensions cannot be checked to print specifications anymore.Drawing/specification review: the manufacturing review shows that the production procedure was according to the specifications and there were no issues that would contribute to this complaint condition.Lot 7735359 was manufactured in march 2012 and all parts were according to our specifications.The used material was stainless steel as required and the measured harness was within the specification.The broken surface is homogenous what indicates material conformity as well.Summary: the received condition of the device is concordant with the complaint description and the complaint condition is confirmed.Based on the provided information we are not able to determine the exact cause of this complaint.The damage at the tip indicates that a mechanical overloading situation during use is most probably the reason for the breakage of the tip.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed as no product related issue could be detected.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|