|
Attorney alleges that on (b)(6) 2017, the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventralight st.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventralight st.As reported, the attorney alleges product is defective and that the patient experienced emotional distress.
|
|
Attorney alleges that on (b)(6) 2017, the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventralight st.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventralight st.As reported, the attorney alleges product is defective and that the patient experienced emotional distress.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2017 ¿ patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of ventralight st (device #1).Per op notes, ¿a round piece of ventralight st mesh was used to cover the hernia defect and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2017 ¿ patient had abdominal pain thereby underwent laparoscopic repair.Per op notes, ¿there was some bowel that was tethered to the mesh.¿.
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-sep-2016) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d3, d4, g1, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|