|
Visual inspection of two post-op x-ray images were provided and evaluated.Images confirmed that the rod disengaged from the bottom screw.Based on the images, it appears that the rod is too short and most likely, the rod was not overhanging the screw 4 mm as indicated in the surgical technique., dimensional, functional inspection, and material analysis could not be performed as the device remains implanted.Complaint history records were not reviewed as a valid lot number was not provided and could not be obtained manufacturing history records were not reviewed as a valid lot number was not provided and could not be obtained.It was confirmed via x-ray that the rod migrated out of the bottom screw post-operatively.No revision surgery is scheduled at this time, no other patient harm has been reported.There were no complications during the original surgery.The date of the surgery is unknown.Patient¿s post op activity level is unknown, unknown if fusion was achieved, patient¿s bone quality is unknown, and unknown if the patient experience a fall, a torque wrench was used to final tighten.Blockers were tightened to 8nm, the screw was not inserted at a difficult angle, the screw holes were prepared with a 4.0 drill, 5.5 mm tap and a screwdriver was used to insert the screws.Short rod placed in the construct, may cause the rod to pull out of tulip post op.In addition, short rod placement may have lead to rod slipping out of the screws.The plausible root cause of the reported event is most likely user error.However without device evaluation this cannot be confirmed.The surgical technique states: "the rod should be cut to the appropriate length with approximately 4 mm of rod overhanging the screw." device remains implanted in patient.
|