Catalog Number 1070350-38 |
Device Problems
Material Separation (1562); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Failure to Advance (2524)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 02/17/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.(b)(4).The location of the reported device was not provided; however, when information is received the investigation will be completed.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a totally occluded right coronary artery that was heavily calcified.An attempt was made to advance a 3.5 x 38 mm xience xpedition stent delivery system (sds) after balloon angioplasty was performed several times.However, the device failed to cross the lesion even when pre-dilatation was performed again.The device was then advanced against resistance; resulting in a shaft fracture [separation].Therefore, the device was replaced with an unspecified device to successfully complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal file number - (b)(4).Mfr site: correction- reg#.Device code 2017 removed.Evaluation summary: the device was returned for analysis.The reported detachment was able to be confirmed.The reported failure to advance the device was unable to be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.A cine was received and reviewed by an abbott vascular clinical specialist.In conclusion, the images confirmed that the anatomy of the rca was extremely calcified and tortuous and may have been the cause for the xpedition stent not crossing.The no cross of the xpedition 3.5x38 mm stent was visible via cine; however, the cine images do not confirm the shaft breaking.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.Manipulation of the device resulted in the noted multiple inner and outer member kinks and ultimately resulted in the reported detachment.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
|
Event Description
|
Subsequent to the initial report, additional information was received.The device failed to cross the lesion due to the anatomy, and the shaft separated when advancing the device against resistance.There was no other device used to complete the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|