|
It was reported, a patient of unknown gender or age, was undergoing a peripheral artery disease (pad) angioplasty leg procedure.Two approach cto microwire wire guides from different lots were used and both tips started to unravel during entry and manipulation through a.014 cxi crossing catheter.The tips were still intact but partially separated.Right leg femoral was the access point where the devices were introduced.Heavy calcification was present in vessel to be treated.A third cto wire was used without any issues.The procedure was completed with no patient adverse effect or additional procedures required.Please see report reference number 1820334-2019-01135 for the other device mentioned here.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Investigation ¿ evaluation.Reviews of the complaint history, device history record, drawing, instructions for use (ifu), quality control, and specifications of the device were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, no physical examinations could be performed.However, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.A review of the device history record shows no nonconforming events which could contribute to this failure mode.It should also be noted there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Furthermore, reviews of the manufacturer¿s instructions, drawings, specifications, and quality control procedures were conducted, and no gaps were discovered.Moreover, an ifu is provided with the device, which states ¿this wire guide is a delicate instrument and should be handled carefully; forceful angulation should be avoided.The wire guide should be advanced only when visualizing the tip of the wire guide fluoroscopically.The wire guide should not be torqued without evidence of corresponding movement of the distal tip.¿ the ifu also states, "upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred." with these reviews, cook has concluded that there are appropriate controls in place to address the reported failure.Based on the information provided and no product returned, investigation has concluded that this event cannot be traced to the device but rather to the patient¿s anatomy.Reportedly, the patient¿s anatomy presented with severe calcification.We will continue our monitoring of similar complaints and have notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|