|
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. COCR 12/14 FEM HEAD 36MM -3; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
71303603 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
04/09/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a revision surgery was performed on the patient.Femoral head and polyethylene liner replaced.The acetabular screw and hole cover was removed.The femoral head presented metallosis.There was no clinical evidence of deep infection.There was no obvious evidence of metallosis beyond the femoral head trunnion connection.No evidence of loosening of the stem or acetabular component.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The associated complaint devices were not returned.A clinical evaluation was conducted and this complaint reports the revision of the femoral head and the polyethylene liner secondary to metallosis.The primary surgery was performed in (b)(6) of 2017.According to the documentation, ¿he developed gradually increasing pain approximately 6 months post implantation.¿ it was also documented that after an episode at an airport (he had to run while carrying luggage a good distance) his pain increased even more.The revision was done in (b)(6) 2018, a little over a year post implantation.The revision operative notes reported; ¿there was considerable black material along the length of the trunnion.There was also black material within the femoral head itself.This was concluded to be metallosis.¿ no metal ion values were provided.Also in the operative notes was this statement; ¿it should be noted that beyond this area, there was no obvious evidence of metallosis.¿ all documents and images provided as of this date have been reviewed and consider and unless noted do not contribute to the clinical investigation.The impact to the patient beyond the interventions and the revision surgery cannot be determined.In conclusion, the clinical information provided, of the black material along the trunnion and the femoral head, may be consistent with a reaction to metal debris.However, the source and the root cause cannot be determined with the available documentation.Early overuse cannot be ruled out with early micromotion producing the clinical findings in the revision surgery.Without the actual product involved and/or device information, our investigation cannot proceed.If the device or new information is received in the future, this complaint can be re-opened.No further actions are being taken at this time.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The devices, used in treatment were not returned for evaluation.A lab analysis was conducted and only visual observations are discussed in this report.No destructive disassembly or destructive testing occurred during this examination.A visual inspection of the poly component face side found some gouges and scarring marks.These are potentially the result of contact with instrumentation during the removal process.The articular surface did not show any unexpected surface marks.Examination of the opposite side of the liner did not reveal any notable or unexpected markings.The femoral head articular side under examination visually displayed minor scratches.The head¿s internal taper provided visual evidence of staining.This is possibly an area of corrosion but cannot be confirmed visually.No evidence of material or manufacturing deviations were found during this investigation.From the visual examination of the returned components, a definite conclusion of what caused the biological response resulting in removal of these implants cannot be reached.A clinical evaluation was conducted and confirms the clinical information provided, of the black material along the trunnion and the femoral head, may be consistent with a reaction to metal debris.Early overuse cannot be ruled out with early micromotion producing the clinical findings in the revision surgery.A review of complaint history on the listed parts revealed no prior complaints for the listed batches with the same failure mode.A review of the device history records for the listed batch did not reveal any deviation from the standard manufacturing processes.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use document revealed this failure mode was previously identified.Factors and/or potential causes that could contribute to the reported event have been identified in the risk management file, as wear, overuse, fretting, or corrosion.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|