| Model Number |
BA25-120/I20-40 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Material Puncture/Hole (1504); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Death (1802); Failure of Implant (1924); Rupture (2208)
|
| Date of Event |
04/28/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Death
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device involved in the event will not be returned for evaluation as it remains implanted in the patient.If additional information pertinent to the incident is obtained, a follow-up report will be submitted.Device iteration is afx with duraply.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was initially implanted with a bifurcated stent graft, a suprarenal stent graft extension and an infrarenal stent graft extension to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm (aaa).Approximately four (4) years post initial procedure, the patient present to the emergency room with a ruptured aneurysm.A type 3a and possible 3b endoleaks were identified by computerized tomography (ct) scan.The patient was reported to be unstable however a secondary procedure was attempted to reline the original implanted with another infrarenal stent graft extension.During the secondary procedure, the patient coded multiple time and cpr was administered but ultimately the patient expired.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was initially implanted with a bifurcated stent graft, a suprarenal stent graft extension and an infrarenal stent graft extension to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm (aaa).Approximately four (4) years post initial procedure, the patient present to the emergency room with a ruptured aneurysm.A type 3a and possible 3b endoleaks were identified by computerized tomography (ct) scan.The patient was reported to be unstable however a secondary procedure was attempted to reline the original implanted with another infrarenal stent graft extension.During the secondary procedure, the patient coded multiple time and cpr was administered but ultimately the patient expired.Additional information: during the clinical assessment, the reported possible 3b endoleak was confirmed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The manufacturing lot evaluation confirmed all devices met specifications prior to release.The device was not returned as the device remains implanted therefore no evaluation was completed.At the completion of the clinical assessment, clinical was able to find substantial evidence to support the following events of a type 3b and 3a endoleaks, rupture and cardiac arrest during the attempted secondary endovascular procedure.Device, user, procedure or anatomy relatedness of the type iiib complaint could not be determined with the medical records and/or imaging available for review.The type 3a endoleak was user related due to the off-label aorta neck anatomy (at 4mm, should be greater than or equal to 15mm).The rupture was related to the type 3a and 3b endoleaks.The cause of the death could not be determined with the medical records and/or imaging available for review however it was confirmed that the patient went into cardiac arrest during the attempted secondary endovascular procedure.No additional investigation of this reported event is planned however if additional information pertinent to the incident is obtained, a follow-up report will be submitted.Endologix will continue to monitor this complaint and similar complaints in the event further investigation is needed.Corrections; b1: has been updated.G1,2: contact office- name has been updated.H1: type of reportable event has been updated.H6: patient code: remove code 1924.H6: device code: remove code 2978.H6: result code: remove code 3221.H6: conclusion code: remove code 11.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|