|
Initial reporter is synthes sales representative.The device was received, and the product evaluation is in progress.No conclusion can be drawn.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Device report from (b)(6) reports an event as follows: it was reported that during surgery on (b)(6) 2019, the tip of a t25 screwdriver shaft broke when the surgeon performed final tightening of the set screw.The surgeon confirmed that there was no broken fragment left in the patient's body under x-ray.It is unknown if there was a surgical delay.The procedure was completed successfully.The patient is in stable condition.Concomitant device: set screws (part unknown, lot unknown, quantity unknown).This report is for one (1) t25 screwdriver.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: h3, h6: part: 03.632.400; lot: 7735357; manufacturing site: hägendorf; release to warehouse date: march 23, 2012.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.Visual inspection: the returned screwdriver shows that the tip of the instrument is broken off as complained.The broken off portion is missing.Dimensional inspection: because of the damages, the complaint relevant dimensions cannot be checked to print specifications anymore.Drawing/specification review: the manufacturing review shows that the production procedure was according to the specifications and there were no issues that would contribute to this complaint condition.Lot 7735357 was manufactured in march 2012 and all parts were according to our specifications.The used material was stainless steel 1.4123 as required and the measured harness was within the specification.The broken surface is homogeneous which indicates material conformity as well.Summary: the received condition of the device is concordant with the complaint description and the complaint condition is confirmed.The damage at the tip indicates that a mechanical overloading situation during use is most probably the reason for the breakage of the tip.The complained issue is clearly a post-manufacturing, use related damage and not from any manufacturing non-conformity.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed as no product related issue could be detected.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|