| Catalog Number |
0117050 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
03/03/2014
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made regarding the bard/davol perfix light plug (device #2) used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney did allege surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.This emdr represents the bard/davol perfix light plug (device #2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol bard flat mesh (device #1).Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that on (b)(6) 2012 or (b)(6) 2014, the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol bard mesh (device #1) or an unspecified bard/davol perfix light plug (device #2).It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard mesh (device #1) and perfix light plug (device #2).As reported, the attorney alleges product is defective and that the patient experienced emotional distress.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that on (b)(6) 2012 or (b)(6) 2014, the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol bard mesh (device #1) or an unspecified bard/davol perfix light plug (device #2).It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard mesh (device #1) and perfix light plug (device #2).As reported, the attorney alleges product is defective and that the patient experienced emotional distress.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2012 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent right inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of perfix light plug (device #1).Per op notes, ¿a perfix light plug (device #1) was placed in the internal ring and mesh was placed on canal floor and secured using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2014 ¿ patient was diagnosed with indirect recurrent right inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of bard flat mesh (device #2).Per op notes, ¿small indirect hernia sac was identified.The tissue adherent to plug (device #1) was dissected out.A bard flat mesh (device #2) was placed into preperitoneal space and anchored to pubic ramus and pubic tubercle.¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made regarding the bard/davol perfix light plug (device #2) used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney did allege surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-apr-2012) is considered to be a best estimate.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol perfix light plug (device #1).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol bard flat mesh (device #2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|