|
|
| Catalog Number |
222207 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Injury (2348); Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Not Applicable (3189); No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
05/02/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).Patient identifier: (b)(6).The complaint device is not being returned, it was implanted in the patient, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.This complaint cannot be confirmed.No nonconformances were identified for this part number, lot number combination per (b)(4) query executed on 5/10/2019.No further information regarding the technique or instruments used has been provided to determine a root cause for this failure.If any additional information is obtained, this complaint will be re-opened to capture that information.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by the sales rep via cst that during an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgical procedure after the 5.5 healix peek three-suture anchor with orthocord was inserted into the patient, the inserter was pulled out and a suture snapped.Fragments were generated and removed without additional intervention.The case was completed with a knotless anchor with no patient harm, but a five minute surgical delay to open the new anchor.It was reported that the anchor was left in the patient.The case was completed by creating a new bone hole and using the knotless anchor.It was reported that the suture was colored big blue check.It was reported that the suture broke at the very middle of suture just under the anchor bridge.It was reported that a suture passer was used in the procedure.It was reported that the surgeon used proper suture management.There was patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #:(b)(4).Depuy synthese is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthese has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthese or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthese, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.: if information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The complaint device is not being returned, it was implanted in the patient, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.This complaint cannot be confirmed.No nonconformances were identified for this part number, lot number combination per qlik query executed on 5/10/2019.No further information regarding the technique or instruments used has been provided to determine a root cause for this failure.If any additional information is obtained, this complaint will be re-opened to capture that information.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Udi: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|