• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH; APPLIANCE, FIXATION, NAIL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH; APPLIANCE, FIXATION, NAIL Back to Search Results
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problems Fall (1848); Necrosis (1971); Non-union Bone Fracture (2369)
Event Date 12/01/2005
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A total of 142 patients (69 male and 73 female) with a mean age of 69 years (range, 33-91 years).Exact date of event is unknown; december 01, 2005 is the date the literature article was published.This report is for an unknown synthes dynamic hip system construct/unknown lot.Part and lot number are unknown; udi number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: wedin, r.And bauer, hcf.(2005), surgical treatment of skeletal metastatic lesions of the proximal femur: endoprosthesis or reconstruction nail?, the bone and joint journal, vol.87-b no.12, pages 1653-1657 (sweden) https://doi.Org/10.1302/0301-620x.87b12.16629.The aim of this retrospective study is to assess the reasons for reconstructive failures related to each method.Between 1996 and 2003, a total of 142 patients (69 male and 73 female) with a mean age of 69 years (range, 33-91 years) underwent surgical treatment of metastatic lesions of the proximal femur.The unreamed femoral nail (synthes stratec medical, oberdorf, switzerland was the locked intramedullary device used.The other reconstruction nail used was the proximal femoral nail (synthes stratec medical).The dynamic hip screw (dhs) synthes stratec medical) was the only sliding screw plate used.The mean follow-up was 1.6 years after the operation.The article did not specify which of the devices were being used to capture the following adverse events: 1 miscellaneous reason for re-operation, 1 was avascular necrosis of the femoral head 19 months after a subtrochanteric fracture had been treated successfully by dhs.Second case was caused by a fall 2 weeks after primary surgery leading to a breakage of a dhs.3 cases of nonunion occurred in 2 patients with reconstruction nails, and 1 with a dhs which broke at the site of the fracture, between 7 and 27 months after the primary surgery.This report is for an unknown synthes dynamic hip system construct.This is report 3 of 8 for (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
APPLIANCE, FIXATION, NAIL
Manufacturer (Section D)
OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf 4436
SZ  4436
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
1302 wright lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key8654156
MDR Text Key146506172
Report Number8030965-2019-64678
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KTT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSW
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/02/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/30/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/02/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-