|
We have not received the device for evaluation since the device has been discarded for the user.Hence, we could not conclusively determine the root cause of the defect.Our review of the lot history records for this lot did not find any discrepancies either in the manufacturing or packaging process that could be related to this incident.Further, we have not received any other complaints of a similar nature for devices from this lot.Our quality control inspector had also performed pull test on a sample of the catheters from this lot number during in-process inspection.All of these units passed the qc requirements and performed as intended when tested to their validated force.It is possible that some anatomical or procedural factors may have contributed to the balloon rupture.Our ifu appropriately warns the users about the risks that could occur with the use of the embolectomy catheter including the risk of balloon rupture due to exposure to calcified plaque or overinflated balloon.The arterial embolectomy catheter is not recommended for the removal of fibrous, adherent or calcified material ( eg.Chronic clot, atherosclerotic plaque ).This catheter is not designed to withstand the additional pull force needed to remove these materials.
|