| Model Number |
G48419 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Activation Problem (4042)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
05/14/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported the customer deployed the endograft correctly and took away the first trigger wire.The problem appeared when they tried to push the nose after unscrewing the pin vise.The surgeon was not able to push the nose of the dilator to deploy the bare stent.The surgeon performed the troubleshooting for this issue that is found in the ifu and it solved the issue.The patient was not injured and final imaging with fluoroscopy and contrast liquid was perfect.Additional information regarding the patient and event have been requested.This report contains all information available at this time.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information regarding event details was received on 20oct2019.Clarification of the sequence of events was provided.After removing the first trigger wire, the top cap could not be released.A coda balloon was inserted and inflated from the contralateral side.The top cap still couldn't be released.The second trigger wire on the ipsilateral limb was removed.The doctor was then able to release the top cap.The pin vise was loosened and retightened between the different steps.This means that both trigger wires were removed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged or unavailable.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported in additional information received on (b)(6) 2019 that the surgeon "opened the 2 security wires during the first step" and a coda balloon was needed to open the top cap.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Additional information: b5, d10, e1, e4.H6 - results code: difficulty removing the top cap from the suprarenal stent.Investigation ¿ evaluation.A review of the complaint history, device history record, drawing, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, quality control, similar complaints, and documentation were conducted during the investigation.The visual inspection of the complaint device could not be completed as the complaint device was not returned for investigation.Additionally, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.The proper procedures are in place to identify and prevent the release of non-conforming product related to the reported failure mode.The device history record for lot 9633269 found no non-conformances.A similar device lot 9647054 was reviewed and found no non-conformances.A review of complaint history records for this product lot number indicates there are no other reported complaints from lot 9633269 or similar device lot 9647054.There is no evidence to suggest there is any nonconforming product in house or out in the field.Based on the information provided, no inspection of returned product and the results of the investigation, a definitive cause could not be established.Appropriate measures have been taken to address this failure mode.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient is doing fine.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|