| Model Number |
M0062101620 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Burst Container or Vessel (1074)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
05/15/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Although the suspect device has been received, the evaluation has not been completed.Therefore, the cause of the reported malfunction has not been determined.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a nephromax balloon catheter was used in the kidney during a cystoscopy procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the balloon was attempted to be inflated; however, the balloon burst.The procedure was completed with another nephromax balloon catheter.There have been no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be fine.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a nephromax balloon catheter was used in the kidney during a cystoscopy procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the balloon was attempted to be inflated; however, the balloon burst.The procedure was completed with another nephromax balloon catheter.There have been no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be fine.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block h6: problem code 1074 captures the reportable issue of balloon burst.Block h10: investigation result a visual examination of the returned complaint device found that the balloon was torn longitudinally.The torn stretched from the proximal markerband to the distal markerband.No other issue noted on the device.This failure is likely due to factors or conditions related to procedure during the use of the device that could have affected its performance and its intended purpose.Therefore, the most probable root cause is adverse event related to procedure.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and confirmed that this device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.A labeling review was performed and from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu)/product label.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|