|
As reported by an affiliate, during a coil embolization there was difficulties detaching a deltaxsft10 3mm x 4cm coil (dlx100304, l12179), requiring additional manipulation.The coil did finally detach.There were no consequences to the patient.The event did not result in a clinically significant delay in the procedure.Pre-deployment electrical testing was performed before use and the results were ok.During the detachment cycle, the detachment light did illuminate and there was audible signal beep.All connections appear to fit properly without application of excessive force.Although there were no alleged product malfunctions with the enpower detachable control box (dcb), the dcb was not used with subsequent coils.The target site was a cerebral right middle aneurysm.Neck remodeling was utilized with a non-cerenovus stent.The dcb will be returned for analysis.
|
|
Product complaint # = > (b)(4).The following sections have been updated on this mdr supplemental #2 report: g4, g7, h2, h3 and h6.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.[complaint conclusion] as reported by an affiliate, during a coil embolization there was difficulties detaching a deltaxsft10 3mm x 4cm coil (dlx100304), requiring additional manipulation.The coil did finally detach.There were no consequences to the patient.The event did not result in a clinically significant delay in the procedure.Pre-deployment electrical testing was performed before use and the results were ok.During the detachment cycle, the detachment light did illuminate and there was audible signal beep.All connections appear to fit properly without application of excessive force.Although there were no alleged product malfunctions with the enpower detachable control box (dcb), the dcb was not used with subsequent coils.The target site was a cerebral right middle aneurysm.Neck remodeling was utilized with a non-cerenovus stent.A non-sterile unit deltaxsft10 3mm x 4cm was received inside of a pouch.The hub was inspected, and no damages was noted on it.The dpu was inspected and it was found in good normal conditions.Also, the marker band was found at 39.2 cm from hub, and it was found within specification.The re-sheathing tool was inspected, and it was found in good normal conditions.The introducer was inspected, and it was found unzipped in good normal conditions.The v-notch was inspected under microscope and it was found in good normal conditions.The rh was inspected under microscope and it was found heated.The articulation joint and the embolic coil were not returned for evaluation.The functional analysis could not be performed due to the embolic coil was not returned for analysis.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device l12179 number, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.The complaint reported by the customer ¿coil - failure to detach¿ could not be evaluated due the embolic coil was not returned with the device for evaluation.The exact cause of the event could not be determined; however, there are circumstances of the procedure that may have contributed to the reported failure.Neither the product analysis nor the mre review suggests that the failure could be related to the enterprise manufacturing process.Failure to detach is a known potential issue associated with the use of this device.The instructions for use (ifu) contains several precautions related to this issue and includes instructions for troubleshooting the situation should it be encountered during use.With the limited information available and without the products available for analyses, the reported customer complaint could not be confirmed.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.
|