| Model Number |
N/A |
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a damaged catheter was inconclusive due to the nature of the returned sample.The product returned for evaluation was one photograph depicting a 5fr t/l powerpicc solo catheter.The depicted device was placed in a plastic bag.No catheter damage was discernible.Also visible in the photograph was a wire.It could not be determined if the wire was the kit guidewire or the catheter stylet.No wire damage was discernible.No damage was confirmed through inspection of the submitted photograph; however, the implicated device could not be conclusively evaluated.Consequently this complaint is inconclusive at this time.A lot history review (lhr) of recw0998 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that picc sheered apart during insertion.It was stated the internal wire seems to have gotten snagged toward the wing where it tapers and ripped approximately an inch jagged line through the underbelly of the line.The internal wire unraveled in different parts as well.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that picc sheered apart during insertion.It was stated the internal wire seems to have gotten snagged toward the wing where it tapers and ripped approximately an inch jagged line through the underbelly of the line.The internal wire unraveled in different parts as well.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a damaged catheter is confirmed and appears to be related to the use of the device.One triple-lumen 5 fr powerpicc solo catheter was returned for investigation.The catheter extended up to the 35 cm depth marker.Evidence of use was observed on the surface of the device.The t-lock stylet assembly was returned outside of the catheter.The stylet was observed to be uncoiled and frayed.A jagged longitudinal split was observed from the trifurcation hub and extended between the 0 and 1 cm depth markers.The damage was observed to extend onto the molded hub.One photograph depicting a 5fr t/l powerpicc solo catheter was also returned but did not provide concise information.Microscopic observation of the distal end of the core wire to be slightly rounded which suggest it failed due to excessive tensile force.Microscopic observation of the internal surface of the catheter revealed the damage to extend further than the damage present on the outer surface which is suggestive of stylet damage.The damage observed on the catheter is consistent with damage caused from removing the stylet against resistance.The product ifu contains multiple precautions and steps that may have prevented this issue which include, "preflush the catheter - a.Attach prefilled syringe to the luer attachment on the t-lock extension set and flush catheter with sterile saline" and "caution: never use force to remove the stylet.Resistance can damage the catheter.If resistance or bunching of the catheter is observed, stop stylet withdrawal and allow the catheter to return to normal shape.Withdraw both the catheter and stylet together approximately 2 cm and reattempt stylet removal.Repeat this procedure until the stylet is easily removed.Once the stylet is out, advance the catheter into the desired position.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|