| Model Number |
EB015 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Mechanical Jam (2983)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
05/16/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The incident device is anticipated to return.A follow-up report will be provided upon completion of investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Procedure performed: resektion rectum ca / rectum resection first test with eb015 in neuruppin- with oa dr.[name], i was in the operating room (or) and had explained the devices.After app.1,5 hours of use of eb 015 in the procedure, the handpiece could not be opened anymore.Tissue was in the device and the device was hanging on the tissue.Several attempts to open the branches failed, the surgeon needed to cut the branches out of the device.It was only fatty tissue - not vessels.Afterwards a second handpiece was opened - see another cer neuruppin 2.Additional information received from sales representative by email on 17may2019: the handle was locked ,sticked - no bleeding.The surgeons did not seal several times, he only wanted to open the handle and branches.It was locked.The device had been used 1,5 hours, app.60-80 activations.Cleaning was 6¿8 times.The surgeon did not notice an improvement when the jaws were cleaned.No liquid or lubricant solution was applied to the jaws.It was not visible where along the jaws the tissue stuck.The jaws were not submerged in fluid.The patient did not exhibit any vascular pathology.The device was not activated on diseased or inflamed tissue.The patient was not given any anti-coagulation medicine.Patient status: the procedure went normally with another device.Intervention: change of device.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Procedure performed: "resection" rectum ca / rectum resection.First test with eb015 in neuruppin- with oa dr.[name], i was in the operating room and had explained the devices.After app.1,5 hours of use of eb 015 in the procedure, the handpiece could not be opened anymore.Tissue was in the device and the device was hanging on the tissue.Several attempts to open the branches failed, the surgeon needed to cut the branches out of the device.It was only fatty tissue - not vessels afterwards a second handpiece was opened - see another cer neuruppin 2.Additional information received from sales representative by email on 17may2019: the handle was locked ,sticked - no bleeding.The surgeons did not seal several times, he only wanted to open the handle and branches.It was locked.The device had been used 1,5 hours, app.60-80 activations.Cleaning was 6¿8 times.The surgeon did not notice an improvement when the jaws were cleaned.No liquid or lubricant solution was applied to the jaws.It was not visible where along the jaws the tissue stuck.The jaws were not submerged in fluid.The patient did not exhibit any vascular pathology.The device was not activated on diseased or inflamed tissue.The patient was not given any anti-coagulation medicine.Patient status: the procedure went normally with another device.Intervention: change of device.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The event unit was returned to applied medical for evaluation.Visual inspection confirmed the complainant's experience of a locked handle.Engineering observed that the trigger lock, a metal component located at the bottom of the trigger, was bent.Based on the condition of the returned unit, it is likely that the reported event was caused by deformation of the trigger lock, which is used to engage and disengage the trigger from the handle.The probability and criticality of harm resulting from this failure have been evaluated and were found to be at an acceptable level.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|