• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOPERSURGICAL, INC. LEEP SYSTEM 1000 ESU GEN.

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOPERSURGICAL, INC. LEEP SYSTEM 1000 ESU GEN. Back to Search Results
Model Number 52969
Device Problems Failure to Cut (2587); Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure (3023)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 07/02/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Investigation: x-inspect returned samples.Analysis and findings: the complaint unit was manufactured on march 2008 and shipped to the customer on april 17, 2008.A review of the 2 year complaint history for the leep system 1000 esu gen.Shows similar complaint conditions on file.Service & repair confirmed the complaint and had replaced the diaphragm to repair the device.The foot pedal has been known to fail due to a few reasons.The most common is the diaphragm which acts as the mechanism to make contact (for electrical current) to supply power to the unit.This particular failure is actually not due to the foot pedal portion of the device, but another component inside the housing.Air displacement pushes on a piston, via a diaphragm, into a switch to turn the power on.The foot pedal creates the air displacement to the pneumatic switch mechanism located in the housing of the unit.The diaphragm breaks down just enough to lose its seal and cannot function properly.The diaphragm material has been described as a rubber, possibly a latex.Given the appearance of a bad diaphragm it appears to have been exposed to excessive stimuli.Materials like latex are flexible hence the use in this application but its elastic properties can alter over time as well.In this degraded condition the sealing properties are impacted and it will not function as intended.The root cause for this complaint condition is being attributed to degradation of the diaphragm.Correction and/or corrective action: coopersurgical service and repair team replaced the diaphragm on the unit and returned it to the customer.Sustaining engineering has successfully tested a replacement material made of silicone for use in assembly and repairs going forward, eng-test-10341-r.The dfu was also updated to add a safety check via ecn-20444.A service bulletin was issued to existing customers informing them to check for this issue and return the unit if needed.All product in fg and sk, as applicable, were reworked to replace the previous versions of the dfus on all applicable products.The repaired unit will have been repaired with this new silicone material.This is not an assembly issue.Complaints will continue to be monitored to determine if there is any new trend for this complaint condition.Was the complaint confirmed? yes.
 
Event Description
Review of service and repair logs: customer stated "will not cauterize or cut".(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEEP SYSTEM 1000 ESU GEN.
Type of Device
LEEP SYSTEM 1000 ESU GEN.
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOPERSURGICAL, INC.
corporate drive
trumbull CT 06611
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOPERSURGICAL, INC.
75 corporate drive
trumbull CT 06611
Manufacturer Contact
peter niziolek
50 corporate drive
trumbull, CT 06611
2036015200
MDR Report Key8692303
MDR Text Key150892415
Report Number1216677-2018-00045
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HGI
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K952483
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Remedial Action Repair
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/12/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number52969
Device Catalogue Number52969
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/13/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received06/12/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/31/2008
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-