| Catalog Number |
72-25-0912 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Unstable (1667)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
05/17/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
An investigation is being performed in an attempt to identify the cause of the event.Review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.There have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.It was reported that no further information will be released by the hospital or surgeon.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation.".
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient's left knee was revised after patient complaint of a feeling of looseness in the knee.Intra-operatively, the post of the ps insert was observed to be broken off.All pieces of the device were removed and a device of the same catalog number was implanted.Rep reported that no further information will be released by the hospital or surgeon.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient's left knee was revised after patient complaint of a feeling of looseness in the knee.Intra- operatively, the post of the ps insert was observed to be broken off.All pieces of the device were removed and a device of the same catalog number was implanted.Rep reported that no further information will be available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Fda registration number corrected to 0002249697 - jr (howmedica) an event regarding crack/fracture involving scorpio insert was reported.The event was confirmed following the completion of a mar method & results: -device evaluation and results: visual inspection visual inspection was performed as part of the material analysis report (mar), dated 16 july 2019.This inspection indicated.[.] delamination, burnishing, scratching and third-body indentation were observed onthe insert dimensional inspection: not performed as the reported device was implanted and subsequently explanted.The device was returned damaged and in its current condition would not be an accurate reflection of its original manufactured condition.Functional inspection: not performed as the reported device was implanted and subsequently explanted.The device was returned damaged and in its current condition would not be an accurate reflection of its original manufactured condition.Material analysis material evaluation was completed and indicated the following comments: visual analysis yellow discoloration consistent with the absorption of synovial fluid was observed on the articulating surface of the insert.Delamination, burnishing, scratching and third-body indentation were observed on the insert.These are common damage modes of uhmwpe.Backside impression markings were observed on the distal surface of the insert, consistent with contact against the baseplate.Damages consistent with the explantation process was also observed on the insert.Beach markings were observed on the anterior portion fracture surface, indicating the device fractured in fatigue.The fatigue crack initiated on the posterior surface of the post and propagated toward the anterior surface.Wallner lines and hackles were also observed on the anterior surface of the post indicating that final fracture occurred in overload.The posterior surface of the post with damage being observed.This damage is likely due to contact with the femoral component.Conclusion the post of the insert fractured in fatigue with final fracture occurring in overload.Delamination, burnishing, scratching and third-body indentation were observed on the insert.These are common damage modes of uhmwpe.Yellow discoloration consistent with absorption of synovial fluid was also observed.Based on the given information, no identifiable materials or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the surfaces examined.-clinician review: no medical records were received for review with a clinical consultant -device history review: all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.Conclusion: a material analysis concluded: the post of the insert fractured in fatigue with final fracture occurring in overload.No further investigation is required at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|