| Catalog Number |
GLM915025 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Positioning Problem (3009)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
05/22/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).Procode: krd/hcg.Lot number was not reported.Manufacturing site name: codman and shurtleff inc., dba depuy synthes products, inc.(b)(4).Information regarding patient age/date of birth, gender, weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.The company is seeking this information through the event investigation.This is one of two products involved with the complaint and the associated manufacturer report numbers are 3008114965-2019-01051.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported by a healthcare professional, during a coil embolization of a left ophthalmic aneurysm (3x4mm), there was difficulty placing two galaxy g3 coils.The microcatheter used was an sl10.The user entered into the aneurysm without difficulty.The first galaxy g3 coil (glx123505, l10142) conformed well within the aneurysm until the last coil loop, the last loop deployed.It pushed the micro catheter out of the aneurysm.After trying 3 times, the coil was removed and replaced with a non-cerenovus 3.5 x8 xtra soft coil without any issue.Then another non-cerenovus 2x6cm coil was placed without any issue.The next coil was a galaxy g3 mini (glm915025, unknown lot).The coil went in fine until the last loop and kicked the microcatheter back.The user tried 3 -4 times and removed the coil.A non-cerenovus coil was placed in without incident.There was no patient injury reported.There was surgery delay due to the events.No other medical intervention was required.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Based on additional information received, section e1 was corrected.The sales representative provided the wrong hospital name initially.Complaint conclusion: as reported by a healthcare professional, during a coil embolization of a left ophthalmic aneurysm (3x4mm), there was difficulty placing two galaxy g3 coils.The microcatheter used was an sl10.The user entered into the aneurysm without difficulty.The first galaxy g3 coil (glx123505, l10142) conformed well within the aneurysm until the last coil loop, the last loop deployed.It pushed the micro catheter out of the aneurysm.After trying 3 times, the coil was removed and replaced with a non-cerenovus 3.5 x8 xtra soft coil without any issue.Then another non-cerenovus 2x6cm coil was placed without any issue.The next coil was a galaxy g3 mini (glm915025, unknown lot).The coil went in fine until the last loop and kicked the microcatheter back.The user tried 3 -4 times and removed the coil.A non-cerenovus coil was placed in without incident.There was no patient injury reported.There was surgery delay due to the events.No other medical intervention was required.The device was discarded and therefore is not available for investigation.The manufacturing record evaluation (mre) cannot be performed due to the lot number was not provided.With the information available and without the product available for analysis, the reported customer complaint of ¿coil - positioning difficulty-poor conformability¿ could not be confirmed.Without a lot number to conduct a mre review, it is not possible to determine if the reported failure could be related to the manufacturing process.Multiple attempts to obtain additional information regarding the procedure were unsuccessful.The exact cause of the event could not be determined; however, there are circumstances of the procedure that may have contributed to the reported failure.The instructions for use (ifu) instructs on proper positioning of the microcoil system.The ifu also warns: ¿if repositioning of the microcoil is necessary, carefully observe the motion of the microcoil in respect to the dpu wire while retracting the microcoil under fluoroscopy.If the microcoil movement is not one-to-one with the dpu wire, or if repositioning is difficult, the microcoil may have become stretched and could possibly break.Gently remove and discard the microcoil system.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|