|
Investigation ¿ evaluation: a visual inspection and functional testing of the returned device was conducted.A document based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record, the instructions for use, and quality control data.One device and two empty packages were returned for investigation.The returned packaging confirms the reported complaint device lot number.Inspection of the returned device noted the device was returned with the handle in the closed position and basket formation was in the open position.A visual examination notes the basket formation was protruding from the end of the basket sheath 1 cm with the basket formation closed.Functional testing noted the handle actuated the basket formation, but did not fully retract the basket formation into the basket sheath.The basket sheath was accordioned starting 5 mm from the distal end of the support sheath and extends for a length of 5 mm.During the actuation of the handle, the basket sheath and support sheath detached, and the handle could no longer actuate the basket formation.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: precaution: enclose the device in the sheath before removing from the tray/holder.Precaution: do not use excessive force to manipulate this device.Damage to the device may occur.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the device aspect in question was visually/functionally inspected by quality control and no related gaps in production or processing controls were noted.The returned device was found to have a basket that was non functional due to sheath damage.The sheath was collapsed (accordion) near the handle.The damaged sheath was preventing the basket from opening and closing properly.The information provided by the user stated the issue occurred before use.The collapsed basket sheath likely occurred due to the basket being closed while the sheath was in a coiled position.When in a tortuous path, either during or before use, closing the basket can place a large compressive force on the sheath, causing it to collapse near the handle.There was no information provided related to handling of the device, so it could not be confirmed that the device was damaged due to handling before use, but it is a possible cause.The two non-returned devices were assumed to have the same issue as the returned device.The cause for the observed sheath damage could not be determined.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed, and it was determined that no additional risk mitigating activity is required.The appropriate internal personnel have been notified and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|