| Model Number |
275010140 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
05/22/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Device is available for evaluation.Investigation will be conducted.Follow up will be filed with the investigation results.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2019, during an unknown procedure the tip of the screwdriver was found twisted before being use.Probably it got twisted due to repeated use since it was a consignment item.Another instrument was used and the tip of the probe broke.It was bent after being used and upon trying to straighten it out a small piece broke off.This was done on the side table and nothing went in the patient, the small fragment was discarded.It is unknown if there was no surgical delay.Patient status is unknown.This complaint involves two (2) device.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).Udi: (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Visual examination at the macroscopic level revealed that the fracture was located at the 10mm from distal tip of the device.The second half of the broken end of the distal tip was not returned.The fracture analysis report reveals uniform rough morphology of the fractured surface indicating that the instrument underwent a static failure.A review of the device history record was conducted.No issues were identified during the manufacturing and release of this product that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.A definitive root cause for the device¿s distal end fracturing cannot be positively determined.However, the fracture analysis report reveals uniform rough morphology of the fractured surface indicating that the instrument underwent a static failure due to a single, sudden, unexpectedly high force placed on the end of the device.As there has been no issue identified in the manufacturing or release of the device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer, this complaint file will be closed with no further action required.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|