| Model Number |
DSN-22-01 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Sedation (2368)
|
| Date of Event |
12/23/2015
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Title: randomized non-inferiority trial comparing diagnostic yield of cytopathologist-guided versus seven passes for endoscopic ultr asound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic masses source: digestive endoscopy 2016; 28: 469¿475; linda s.Lee, division of gastroenterology, received 27 october 2015; accepted 16 december 2015.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.[(b)(4)].
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, this was study regarding a comparison between 2 methods of using the aspiration needle.There were findings of complications on both methods.Post study revealed that there were 5 complications in the cytopathologist -guided arm which included three acute pancreatitis wherein one patient had undergone an endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography at the same time obtaining adequate aspirate of solid mass (pancreatic) using eus.There was one patient that fell during the recovery period, but without associated injuries.The last patient had a broken needle requiring removal of the echoendoscope.Based from the seven-passes there were three complications which included to one patient experiencing an intraprocedure bradycardia that was responded with atropine.Another patient experienced a respiratory distress leading to the procedure being aborted.The last patient developed abdominal pain and fever (normal laboratory studies and abdominal computed tomography) that eventually resolved spontaneously.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|