| Model Number |
9734060 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Imprecision (1307)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
05/21/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Patient weight not available.No parts have been received by the manufacturer for evaluation.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Medtronic received information regarding a navigation system being used for cranial soft tissue ablation procedure.It was reported that intra-operatively, the surgeon reported inaccuracy.The site was using the navigation system to place the laser catheter and that was when the inaccuracy was noted.The site used the air cranial frame and radiolucent articulating arm.After initial registration, the site checked the accuracy on multiple fiducials with the pointer probe and were accurate.The site used the precision aiming device (pad) with the thermal therapy system reducing tube to drill and insert the anchor bold.The surgeon placed the laser catheter and missed the tumor target by 10 millimeters exactly parallel superior/anterior to the plan trajectory.An intra-operative scan was taken and merged with the original and the surgeon tried again.There was no visible brain shift.The surgeon was again off by 10 millimeters.At this point, the surgeon aborted the case.It was noted that the site had registered using point merge using the fiducials.The registration was what was used for the first and second attempt of the surgeon trying to place the catheter.After undraping and breaking down the field, the site's navigation system technician put the nonsterile frame back on before unpinning the patient and when touching the fiducial marks, there were all at least 1 centimeter off.It was suspected that either the reference frame/arm or patient shifted after the procedure or that perhaps the site mis-seated the reference frame they registered with from the beginning making correct placement of sterile reference frame introduce inaccuracy.Medtronic received additional information that the patient archive was reviewed.It was reported that nine points were collected and the area of interest was within the green sphere of accuracy.The quality of the mr exam was pretty good but could have been better.The points were slightly below the skin when checking the orthogonal views, which could have contributed to the inaccuracy.Additionally, some of the fiducials were placed on areas of the patient where there was likely movement of the fiducial.It was noted that the first point behind the patients left ear likely moved, as the patient had headphones on while being scanned, but did not during the actual case.Technical services (ts) recommended that the fiducials be placed on hard anatomy that would not move and that the points be fine-tuned in the orthogonal views to be on the skin.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Information references the main component of the system.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 9735585, software version: 3.1.A medtronic representative went to the site to test the equipment.Testing revealed that the system was functioning normally.The system passed the system checkout and was found to be fully functional.The software investigation was unable to determine probable cause without further information since the on-going investigation proved to be inconclusive based on the information provided.Image analysis noted that nine points were collected and the area of interest was within the green sphere of accuracy.The quality of the mr exam was pretty good, but could be better.The points were slightly below the skin when checking the orthogonal views, which could contribute to the inaccuracy.Additionally, some of the fiducials were placed on areas of the patient where there was likely movement of the fiducial.For example, the first point behind the patients left ear likely moved, as the patient had headphones on while being scanned, but did not during the actual case.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Medtronic received additional information that the patient had a second and successful procedure ten days after the reported event.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|