Pr # (b)(4) on (b)(4) 2019 writer sent the customer an email acknowledging receipt of the complaint, providing the complaint tracking number and requested follow up information including as to if there was any patient impact related to this event.
Writer provided contact information.
Device not yet evaluated, if the device is evaluated a follow up will be sent.
|
Via regulatory maude report: during revision of a knee replacement, the upper portion of the jaw of a v mueller nl6092 pituitary forcep broke.
The broken portion of the instrument was retrieved.
Fda safety report id#.
On 11jun2019 additional information: what was the procedure that was being performed? revision of total knee replacement.
Did any part the instrument fall into the patient¿s body, and if so how was it retrieved? yes.
Retrieved with forcep.
Was there a medical procedure performed to verify if the instrument was in the patient¿s body, such as an x-ray? it was seen breaking and falling into the femoral canal, and then immediately retrieved.
What was the patient¿s outcome? no issues immediately observed.
Was the procedure completed as planned? yes.
Can you please send all parts of the instrument for evaluation? yes.
Do you have the lot number? possibly, xmee 12.
No further information available.
|