|
It was reported that during a hip surgery, the device tip broke off into the patient.Physician attempted to retrieve but was unable to visualize, given small fragment, though not likely to cause harm.The procedure was successfully completed but it is unknown if it was completed with the same device or another device without significant delay.Patient injuries were not reported.
|
|
The device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation.A relationship, if any, between the subject device and the reported event could not be determined since the product was not returned for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed because the device in question was not returned for evaluation.Thus, the complaint could not be verified, nor could a root cause be determined with confidence.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this evaluation will be reopened for investigation.Factors not associated with the manufacture or design of the device which could result in damage to the tip could be the device coming into abrupt contact with a hard (metallic) object, improper insertion or removal from an apparatus, use at a higher than recommended set point or excessive force applied to the tip can also lead to unintended detachment and are outlined in the precautionary statements in the instruction for use (¿ifu¿).There were no indications during manufacturing record review that would suggest that the device did not meet product specifications upon release into distribution.
|