|
The device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.E1: reporters state: pest.H3, h4, h6: a review of the device history record device history lot part:324.033, lot:l747526, manufacturing site: bettlach, release to warehouse date: 06.March 2018.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number.Dhr for the semi-finished part 501704 with lot number l635891.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the semi- finished part, article 501704 / lot number l635891, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.This non-conformance is not relevant to the complaint condition because, it is related to a documentation issue.H3, h6: investigation summary investigation selection investigation site: cq zuchwil , selected flow: damage.Visual inspection: the visual inspection has shown that the tip section is broken.The broken part was not returned for evaluation.Dimensional inspection: due to the damage and the missing broken part the relevant dimension could not be measured.Document/specification review: the manufacturing documents do show that the correct material was used and that the hardness was within specification.As indicated in the manufacturing documents, this lot was inspected to 100% before the part left manufacturing site.Summary: our investigation has shown that the complaint condition is confirmed due to the breakage.Because of the damage, it is not possible to measure the relevant dimension.We are not able to determine the exact cause of this occurrence due to missing detailed clinical information and missing broken part.We suppose that a mechanical overload situation during use could have led to the breakage.Based on the investigation outcome, we conclude that the cause of failure is not due to any manufacturing non-conformance.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed as no product related issue could be detected.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|