• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US MICRO TORNADO HP W HANDCONTROL; LINE-POWERED ARTHROSCOPIC SHAVER SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US MICRO TORNADO HP W HANDCONTROL; LINE-POWERED ARTHROSCOPIC SHAVER SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 283512
Device Problem Defective Device (2588)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 02/04/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the complaint device was received at the service center and was evaluated.The reported complaint by the customer that the handpiece was not working was confirmed.The handpiece was found to be defective.It was further found that the drill mounting mechanism was defective.The burr was hard to be installed.The motor was corroded and did not turn.The bend protection of the motor cable was damaged.The resistance value of the keypad of the handcontrol set was out of specifications.Also the contacts of the keypad were corroded and the buttons didn't function.The defective drill mounting mechanism was replaced.Also the motor, motor cable, and the handcontrol set were replaced.The complaint device was cleaned, repaired and tested for functionality.Fluid contact with the motor has the potential to cause corrosion of the motor, therefore is a potential root cause for the motor being corroded.When the motor is corroded, it has the potential to stick and not turn.The fluid ingress would also have contributed to the corrosion of the keypad contacts, resulting in the damage to the handcontrol set, which in turn, would have caused the resistance values to go out of specifications and the buttons to not function.However, given the information provided we cannot discern a definitive root cause for the defective cable and drill mounting mechanism.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device (serial: (b)(4)), and no non-conformances were identified.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported by the affiliate via mail that micro tornado handpiece with hand control was not working.The issue was found post-operatively at the end of the surgery when there is no need of handpiece.The procedure was completed with no patient harm or surgical delay.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MICRO TORNADO HP W HANDCONTROL
Type of Device
LINE-POWERED ARTHROSCOPIC SHAVER SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
6103142063
MDR Report Key8728496
MDR Text Key149190465
Report Number1221934-2019-57419
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRX
UDI-Device Identifier10886705016938
UDI-Public10886705016938
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJO
PMA/PMN Number
K954465
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,other
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/14/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number283512
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/17/2019
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/20/2019
Initial Date FDA Received06/24/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-