| Catalog Number |
6020-0335 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
03/29/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The following devices were also listed in this report: primary tritanium hemi solidback cup 52mm; cat#: 500-03-52d ; lot#: 43754301.Trident 10° x3 insert 32mm id; cat#: 623-10-32d; lot#: 45009201.Delta v-40 ceramic head 32/0; cat#: 6570-0-132; lot#: 45726001.It cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.A review of the device history records indicate that devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.There have been no other events for the lot referenced.If additional information is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Total hip replacement right on (b)(6) 2013.Revision surgery: implantation stem on (b)(6) 2019.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Total hip replacement right on (b)(6) 2013.Revision surgery: implantation stem on(b)(6) 2019.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
An event regarding a revision surgery for an accolade stem was reported, incorrect selection was confirmed by medical review.Method & results: device evaluation and results: not performed as product was not returned clinician review: a review of the provided medical records and x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: root cause of failure is thus contributed by separation of the gluteus medius muscle from the greater trochanter as a complication of the direct lateral surgical approach to the hip during primary arthroplasty.Clinical symptoms and biomechanical condition of the arthroplasty were made worse by non-anatomic reconstruction of the hip joint through use of a small offset 132° accolade stem in a native high offset hip joint where a 127° larger offset version of the accolade stem would have been more appropriate.Conclusion of assessment separation of the gluteus medius muscle from the greater trochanter occurred as a complication of the direct lateral surgical approach to the hip during primary arthroplasty.Clinical symptoms and biomechanical condition of the arthroplasty were made worse by nonanatomic reconstruction of the hip joint through use of a small offset 132° accolade stem in a native high offset hip joint where a 127° larger offset version of the accolade stem would have been more appropriate.Does the review identify any procedural related factors that contributed to the event? - separation of the gluteus medius muscle from the greater trochanter as a complication of the direct lateral surgical approach non-anatomic reconstruction of the hip joint through use of a small offset 132° accolade stem in a native high offset hip joint where a 127° larger offset version of the accolade stem would have been more appropriate does the review identify any patient related factors that contributed to the event? none does the review identify any device related factors that caused or contributed to the adverse event? no device-related factors are associated with any of the implanted devices consistent with type of failure.Device history review: all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.Conclusion: a review of the provided medical records and x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: does the review identify any procedural related factors that contributed to the event? separation of the gluteus medius muscle from the greater trochanter as a complication of the direct lateral surgical approach non-anatomic reconstruction of the hip joint through use of a small offset 132° accolade stem in a native high offset hip joint where a 127° larger offset version of the accolade stem would have been more appropriate no further investigation is required at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|