|
It was reported that patient was presented to physician for triple vessel disease.During high risk percutaneous coronary intervention 25 cm failed to insert and 13cm sheath had difficulty in inserting.13cm introducer was placed with difficulty.When event occur, user was attempting to pass pump through patient anatomy when heavily calcified arteries were found.After that femoral angiogram revealed perforation.Because of multiple introducer insertion attempts vessel perforation occurred and surgical intervention required to repair injury.There were no specific technique used for insertion and 1 device was planned to be introduced in the device.Device was used in tortuous path.The procedure was aborted, vascular surgery was performed, and procedure was successfully completed the following week without support of the impella.
|
|
Corrected data : follow up 1 mdr missing g7 information in h10 section.Oscor inc.Is submitting the above report to comply with 21 cfr part 803, the medical device reporting regulation.The report is based upon information obtained by oscor inc.Which the company may not have been able to investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by fda.This report does not constitute an admission that the device, oscor inc., or its employees, caused or contributed to the event described in this report.Nor does this report reflect a conclusion by fda, oscor inc., or its employees, that the report constitutes an admission that the device, oscor inc., or its employees caused or contributed to the event described in this report.
|
|
Two 14f abiomed introducer sheaths were returned from the customer with five dilators.There were no other accessories.Blood was found on the interior and exterior of the sheaths and the dilators.Some of the devices were damaged upon receipt.Upon evaluation of the returned devices, it was found that the 14f, 13cm sheath had damage around the circumference of the distal tip edge and scrape marks approximately 1cm from the distal tip.The 14f, 25cm sheath was not damaged.Three dilators (12f 13cm, 14f 21cm and 14f 33cm) had deep scrape marks down the length of the dilator lumen.The 8 and 10f dilators looked normal.The 14f abiomed introducer sheath passed all in-process and qa final inspection steps as per dhr review.No manufacturing defects were found during returned device evaluation.Multiple introducer insertion attempts into the vessel, tortuous patient anatomy and heavily calcified arteries mentioned in the event description could have been potential contributing factors to the sheath tip and dilators damage.The device history record was reviewed to confirm that the device passed all applicable in-process and final inspections.Per procedure adelante s2s introducer sheath in-process and final inspection: visual inspection: with naked eye at a distance of 12" to 18", verify the assembled sheath tip and body matches the drawing.Ensure parts are free of kinks, cracks, splits, sinks, excessive flash, loose/embedded fm.First 5 consecutive properly tipped parts, inspect 100%.Visual inspection: under 10x magnification verify: the sheath tip is round.Verify proper tip shape according to drawing.Slight discoloration from tipping process is acceptable.No split score lines (inspect both score lines) along sheath body, cracks, gouges, tears.Per ifu: never advance or withdraw guidewire or sheath when resistance is met.Determine cause by fluoroscopy and take remedial action.Avoid subjecting the device to unusual stresses.Based on the investigation, a capa is not required as findings did not identify a design, labeling or manufacturing non-conformity.In addition, there was no new failure mode identified.The event will be re-evaluated if additional information becomes available.Oscor will continue to monitor this event type and risk.Oscor inc.Is submitting the above report to comply with 21 cfr part 803, the medical device reporting regulation.The report is based upon information obtained by oscor inc.Which the company may not have been able to investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by fda.This report does not constitute an admission that the device, oscor inc., or its employees, caused or contributed to the event described in this report.Nor does this report reflect a conclusion by fda, oscor inc., or its employees, that the report constitutes an admission that the device, oscor inc., or its employees caused or contributed to the event described in this report.
|