|
Reporter is a synthes employee.The device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h4, h6: a device history record (dhr) review was conducted: part number: 03.010.056, synthes lot number: 4771166, supplier lot number: n/a, release to warehouse date: 05oct2004, expiration date: n/a, manufactured by synthes brandywine.Mrr was generated during production for 1 part with scuff mark on od, and 2 parts with excessive heat that stain.All 3 parts were returned and scrapped.This non-conformance is not relevant to the complaint condition since it is not related to after washing at the sterile processing department wooden handle of slide/fixed hammer broke/split.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any subcomponents, which would contribute to this complaint condition.H3, h6: a product investigation was conducted.Visual inspection: the slide hammer was received at the us cq.The handle of the device was received separated from the main assembly in two halves, split down its vertical axis.The two (2) 3mm diameter dowel pins that would secure the handle to the shaft were not received.The hammer had signs of wear from typical usage, such as scratches and dents on the head.The faces of the head had a brownish yellow discoloration around the recess.No other issues were identified with the returned portions of the device.Dimensional inspection: handle thickness was measured and was conforming as per relevant drawing.Manufacturing record evaluation: the received device (part # 03.010.056 lot # 4771166) was manufactured at the synthes brandywine site on 05 october 2004.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any subcomponents, which would contribute to this complaint condition.Conclusion: the complaint was confirmed for the slide hammer.The handle of the hammer was split in two (2) pieces down its vertical axis.The dowel pins used to hold the handle to the shaft were missing from the assembly.The hammer was covered in scratches, and the faces of the head had many small dents and discoloration.There was no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.No design issues were observed during the document/specification review.While no definitive root cause could be determined, it is possible that the device encountered unintended forces.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|