|
WRIGHTS LANE SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS LLC TFNA FENESTRATED HELICAL BLADE 110MM; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
04.038.410 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional device product code: ktt.(b)(4).The device has been received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on an unknown date, the locking mechanism in the trochanteric fixation nail advance (tfna) nail did not lock the unknown helical blade in place and the helical blade then advanced medially.This could have been caused by surgeon error during the implant or a failed locking mechanism.The implants were removed/explanted on (b)(6) 2019.It was unknown if there was a surgical delay.Procedure outcome and patient status are unknown.This report captures the intra-op event, where the locking mechanism did not engage/failed during implantation, while related complaint (b)(4) captures the post-op event that the helical blade perforated through the femoral head.This report is for one (1) tfna fenestrated helical blade.This is report 2 of 2 for complaint (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
07/15/2019: updated event description: it was reported that on an unknown date, the locking mechanism in the trochanteric fixation nail advanced (tfna) nail did not lock the unknown helical blade in place and the helical blade then advanced medially.This could have been caused by surgeon error during the implant or a failed locking mechanism.The implants were removed/explanted on (b)(6) 2019.It was unknown if there was a surgical delay.Procedure outcome and patient status are unknown.Concomitant device reported: titanium locking screw (part #: 458.940, lot #: h499571, quantity #: 1).This complaint involves two (2) device.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Updated event information provided for reporting.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.A device history record (dhr) review was conducted: part number: 04.038.410s, lot number: h679035, part manufacturing date: 01 august 2018, manufacturing site: elmira, part expiration date: 30 june 2028, nonconformance noted: n/a.A review of the device history record revealed no complaint related anomalies.The device history record shows lot h679035 of tfna fenestrated helical blades was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework or nonconformances noted.This lot met all dimensional and visual criteria at the time of manufacture with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.A review of the raw material device history record(s) determined the raw material lot h611883 met all specifications with no issues documented that would contribute to this complaint condition.A product investigation was conducted.Visual inspection: tfna fenestrated helical blade 110mm ¿ sterile was received at cq.Upon visual inspection at cq, it is observed that the device shows discoloration and wear marks.The helical portion of the device was stripped.Functional test: functional inspection cannot be performed as the post operation condition cannot be replicated at cq.Dimensional inspection (calipers: ca802): dimensional inspection of the device was performed at cq.The diameter of the helical blade was measured and is within specification as per relevant drawing.The distance between the flat surface and curved surface of the helical blade was measured and is within specification as per relevant drawing.The complaint is confirmed.The reported condition of the locking mechanism cannot be confirmed because no additional information to confirm the complaint condition like x-rays and other documents were not received from the customer.Document/ specification review: the relevant drawing(s) was reviewed; no design issues or discrepancies were found during this investigation.Investigation conclusion: visual inspection, dimensional inspection, and document specification review of the received device was performed at cq.The complaint is confirmed as the device shows stripped and discolored surface, but the reported locking mechanism condition cannot be confirmed with the available information.A definitive root cause could not be determined.During the investigation no unidentified product design/manufacturing issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|