| Model Number |
M0061921220 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
05/31/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Patient's exact age is unknown; however it was reported that the patient was over the age of 18.(b)(4).Premarket/510(k)# - k010002.The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a polaris ultra stent was used during a kidney stones removal surgery procedure in the kidney, performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during unpacking, it was noticed that the stent was broken along the shaft.There was no serious injury, nor were there any adverse patient effects reported as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a polaris ultra stent was used during a kidney stones removal surgery procedure in the kidney, performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during unpacking, it was noticed that the stent was broken along the shaft.There was no serious injury, nor were there any adverse patient effects reported as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block a2: patient's exact age is unknown; however it was reported that the patient was over the age of 18.Block f10; h6: problem code 1069 captures the reportable event of stent shaft break.Block g5: premarket/510(k)# - k010002.Block h10: a polaris ultra stent was returned for analysis.A visual evaluation of the returned device revealed that the shaft of the stent was detached.Based on the product analysis, the issue was noted during the procedure, moreover, no defects were reported by the customer during the unpacking and preparation.The reported issues observed in the provided images that could have been generated by user, also interaction with other devices might have impacted the integrity of the device during the procedure.Therefore, "adverse event related to procedure" is selected as the most probable root cause for the complaint.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and confirmed that this device met all material, assembly and performance specifications at the time of release for distribution.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|