|
Reporter is synthes employee.The device has been received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: h3, h4, h6: a device history record (dhr) review was conducted: part: 314.480.96.Lot: 7666162.Manufacturing site: hägendorf.Release to warehouse date: 20.Dec.2011.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.H3, h6: a product investigation was conducted.Visual inspection: the 1.0 mm screwdriver blade with holding sleeve (part # 314.48, lot # 7666162, mfg # 20-dec-2011) was received at us cq with the part in 3 separate pieces.The internal sleeve and holding sleeve are together as one unit and the blade and external sleeve are separate.The distal portion of the holding sleeve is flared.There were no signs of breakage on any of the pieces.This is not consistent with the reported complaint condition.Therefore, the complaint is not confirmed.Functional test: a functional test was performed and since the distal portion of the holding sleeve is flared, the device could not be re-assembled.There were no signs of breakage on any of the pieces.The complaint was not able to be replicated, therefore the complaint is not confirmed.Dimensional inspection: dimensional analysis was completed, the outer diameter of the shaft of the blade, measured and is within specification, based on relevant drawing.The inner diameter of the external sleeve measured and is within specification per relevant drawing.Conclusion: there is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.While no definitive root cause could be determined it is possible that the device encountered unintended forces.No new malfunctions were observed during the course of this investigation.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|