|
|
| Catalog Number |
0112670 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Purulent Discharge (1812); Unspecified Infection (1930); Necrosis (1971); Pain (1994); Scar Tissue (2060); Injury (2348); Disability (2371)
|
| Date of Event |
05/09/2011
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges injuries; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol bard mesh on (b)(6) 2010.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard mesh.As reported, the attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." attorney alleges unspecified injuries on (b)(6) 2010.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol bard mesh on (b)(6) 2010.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard mesh.As reported, the attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." attorney alleges unspecified injuries on (b)(6) 2010.Addendum per additional information provided:
(b)(6) 2010- patient was diagnosed with ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of bard flat mesh.Per op notes, ¿the hernia sac with omentum was identified below the umbilicus and the omentum was reduced.The excess hernia sac was dissected.A bard flat mesh was placed in the centre of umbilicus and sutured¿.(b)(6) 2010- patient was diagnosed with necrosis of a portion of abdominal wound, thereby underwent open repair.Per op notes, ¿the necrosis was at the junction of the transverse extended suprapubic incision and the vertical midline incision.Some necrosis under the bard flat mesh was identified.The necrotic tissue were debrided¿.(b)(6) 2010- patient was diagnosed with infected abdominal wall, thereby underwent open repair with debridement of the skin and subcutaneous tissue of abdominal wall defect.(b)(6) 2010- patient was diagnosed with lower abdominal wound, thereby underwent open repair with debridement of the lower abdominal wound.(b)(6) 2010- patient was diagnosed with pain and abdominal wound, thereby underwent open repair with debridement of abdominal wound.(b)(6) 2011- patient was diagnosed with abdominal wall infection, thereby underwent open repair with partial removal of bard flat mesh.Per op notes, ¿the infected bard flat mesh was excised.¿
(b)(6) 2012- patient was diagnosed with infected abdominal wall, thereby underwent open repair with partial explant of bard flat mesh.Per op notes, ¿there was a purulent drainage was noted and a bard flat mesh underneath.The infected part of the mesh was excised.There was a large depressed scar was noted in the midline of abdominal wall¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges injuries; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum:
h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and corrected the date of event.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-oct-2009) is considered to be the best estimate.Updated data: a2, b2, b4, b5, b7, d3, d4 (product catalog no, corporate lot no, udi no, expiry date), d6.B (date of explant), g1, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10, h11.Corrected data: b3 (date of event).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|