|
Model Number P101520 |
Device Problems
Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problems
Abscess (1690); Adhesion(s) (1695); Erosion (1750); Hematoma (1884); Excessive Tear Production (2235); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of a hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced recurrence, hematoma, extensive dense adhesions, and serosal tear.Post-operative patient treatment included drainage of hematoma, takedown of adhesions, serosal tear repair, incisional hernia recurrence repair, lysis of adhesions, dissection of previous mesh which had split apart, and back to intensive care unit (icu) post-surgery.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of a hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced abscess, recurrence, hematoma, extensive dense adhesions, mesh erosion into viscera, mesh migration and serosal tear.Post-operative patient treatment included drainage of hematoma, takedown of adhesions, serosal tear repair, incisional hernia recurrence repair with additional implants, lysis of adhesions, dissection of previous mesh which had split apart and back to icu post-surgery.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This information was received as a part of an extensive mesh litigation submission to medtronic.The fda was notified of this large complaint receipt.Due to the volume of complaint information received by medtronic, this resulted in a report beyond the 30 day target.Additional information: (c50552).Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This information was received as a part of an extensive mesh litigation submission to medtronic.The fda was notified of this large complaint receipt.Due to the volume of complaint information received by medtronic, this resulted in a report beyond the 30 day target.Additional information: h6: patient code-c64343 (abdominal mass).Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of a hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced abscess, recurrence, hematoma, extensive dense adhesions, mesh erosion into viscera, mesh migration and serosal tear, and abdominal mass.Post-operative patient treatment included drainage of hematoma, takedown of adhesions, serosal tear repair, incisional hernia recurrence repair with additional implants, lysis of adhesions, dissection of previous mesh which had split apart and back to icu post-surgery.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|