| Catalog Number |
SMXP155RH |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Material Separation (1562); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
05/24/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: migration.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a (b)(6) year-old female who had 850cc artoura breast tissue expanders placed experienced right sided deflation and left sided rotation post procedure.The right sided suture tab tore away from the shell, and left sided sutures tore.As a result, bilateral replacement with 850cc artoura breast tissue expanders was performed.This report relates to the left prosthesis.See 1645337-2019-15166 for contralateral prosthesis report.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The investigation of the photograph provided was completed by the failure analysis lab on (b)(6) 2019.Device evaluation summary: according to the information received, it was reported that left tissue expander had all sutures torn, and the expander completely rotated causing device migration.Upon visual inspection of the picture a tear in one of the suture tabs was noted.No other anomalies were noted.The photos do not provide enough evidence to determine root cause.It is possible the rotation was caused due to the issue with the suture tab.As part of our quality process, each device is visually inspected during manufacturing to ensure the device meets the required specifications prior to shipment, however, no potential cause could be established since the device was not returned for analysis.An investigation was opened to determine and address the root cause of the suture tab breakage, including but not limited to, additional investigation related to design and manufacturing.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On 8/13/2019 mentor became aware that the device code for material separation was erroneously omitted from the initial report.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|