| Catalog Number |
0112740 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Unspecified Infection (1930); Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
05/01/2008
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol bard (marlex) mesh dart on (b)(6) 2002.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard/davol bard (marlex) mesh dart.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.As reported, the attorney alleges patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol bard (marlex) mesh dart on (b)(6) 2002.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard/davol bard (marlex) mesh dart.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.As reported, the attorney alleges patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2002 ¿ patient was diagnosed with umbilical hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of dart mesh.Per op notes,¿ the hernia defect was plugged with a large dart plug anchored into peritoneum and fascia all around with interrupted sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2008 ¿ patient was diagnosed with infected mesh thereby underwent open repair with the removal of mesh.Per op notes, ¿the previous mesh was removed along with the hernia sac and the infected mesh was removed along with the fascia surrounding the mesh.¿ (b)(6) 2008 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of synthetic mesh.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|