| Catalog Number |
THS-LS-C |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Use of Device Problem (1670)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
04/17/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation visual inspection found that the cutter driver was located within the distal assembly approximately 1.0cm distal to the cutter window.Microscopic examination of the cutter window revealed no anomalies.Dried blood was observed on the torque shaft and inside the cutter window.The thumbswitch was attempted to be advanced; however, the thumb switch was unable to be advanced.The returned turbohawk was connected to a cutter driver from the lab and the cutter was able to successfully power and retract.The cutter was examined under the microscope and no anomalies were noted.Biological debris was noted on the distal end of the cutter.The cutter was attempted to be advanced again; however, the cutter was unable to be advanced past 1.0cm, biological debris was noted at the location of the of the cutter.The device was then flushed and the cutter was advanced again.The cutter was able to successfully advance 2.6cm distal to the cutter window.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the physician intended to use a turbohawk atk with a non-medtronic (abbott) 0.014 guidewire during treatment of a 40mm plaque calcified 70% stenotic lesion in the patient¿s mid superficial femoral artery (sfa) of diameter 5mm.No tortuosity along with moderate calcification were reported.Ifu was followed and the device during prep.It was reported that the device jammed during prep and would not close.The thumbswitch was unable to open and close the cutter.No deformation or damage was noted to the tip.Motor issues were experienced when attempted to be turned on and off.Device not used in patient.No allegation noted with spider fx device mentioned.When the device was returned to the manufacturing facility it was noted to be damaged.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|