|
A search for non-conformances associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.A lot history trending review was performed and there were no similar complaints for this lot number.The pusher, microcatheter, and hub were returned for analysis.The implant, introducer, and dispenser hoop were not returned.The pusher was returned partially inside the microcatheter and hub.The proximal end of the pusher had sustained damage in multiple locations in the form of breaks and bends.The transition section of the pusher was broken, but the lead wires were still intact.It could not be determined if the damage was the result of shipping or if it occurred during use.The distal end of the pusher was found to be in the microcatheter and to have the body coil stretched from the hub on the catheter through the valve to the pusher.The microcatheter was found to be in good condition and without damage.No collapsing of the liner or damage to the braid was noted.The location where the distal tip of the pusher resided in the microcatheter did not exhibit signs of damage.The distal heater coil assembly was intact.The body coil was stretched and twisted upon return.The monofilament was extracted to determine the profile of the break.The profile exhibited some crushing and a slight tail.The monofilament was rebounded.190" into the heater coil assembly.Based on the investigation findings and available information, the reported complaint is confirmed.The implant was not returned and was detached from the pusher.The pusher was found to be severely stretched.The damage to the pusher did not allow for track testing within a microcatheter.No indicators were identified on the microcatheter that would indicate it was the root cause.Though it cannot be confirmed, the profile on the mono is indicative of a unit that was under tensile duress that likely underwent forces that exceed its specification.The root cause cannot be identified but appears to be related the retraction method during repositioning.The instructions for use (ifu) identifies premature or difficult coil detachment as potential complications associated with use of the device.
|