| Catalog Number |
1010483-H |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Separation (1562)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In (1204); Embolism (1829)
|
| Date of Event |
06/19/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
G9: exemption number e2019001-permits numbering sequence to begin with 10000, to avoid duplication of report numbers due to process transition.There may be gaps in numbering for reports submitted during the transition period.The customer reported the device was discarded.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.Na.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion located in the superficial femoral artery (sfa) /popliteal artery that was non-tortuous and moderately calcified.During removal of the hi-torque pilot 50, resistance was noted, and the wire tip fractured while in the sfa.The separated segment remained in the artery where it migrated to the mid-popliteal artery.A supera stent was deployed to keep the fractured segment of the pilot guide wire in place.There was no reported adverse patient sequela or a clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned to abbott vascular for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents reported from this lot.The reported patient effect of embolism is listed in instructions for use guide wire hi-torque guide wires ce fda as a known patient effect of the procedure.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to operational circumstances of the procedure.It is likely that during the procedure, the wire became kinked or bent against the anatomy and/or or other devices used.During retraction, the damage on the guide wire likely caused the reported resistance.Manipulation and/or inadvertent mishandling of the wire during retraction against resistance likely resulted in the tip separation.The reported patient effect and treatment appears to be related to operational circumstances of the procedure as a supera stent was deployed to keep the fractured segment of the pilot guide wire in place.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|