|
(b)(4).Date of event: publication year of 2014.Batch # unk.This report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the manufacturing records cannot be reviewed as the lot/batch number has not been provided.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Does the author/surgeon believe that the ethicon device caused or contributed to the patient complications mentioned in the article? if yes, please explain.(b)(4).
|
|
It was reported via literature entitled: starr with contour® transtar¿ device for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year real-world outcomes of the european transtar registry.Authors: g.Ribaric, a.D¿hoore, g.Schiffhorst and e.Hempel.Citation: int j colorectal dis (2014) 29:611¿622; doi 10.1007/s00384-014-1836-8; published online: 21 february 2014.This prospective cohort study aimed to assess the short-term safety and effectiveness of transtar in the real-world clinical environment where the variation phenomenon exists.Between january 2009 to january 2011, 100 patients (mean age 60 years, range 27-82, female n=98, male n=2) with ods underwent transtar.The contour transtar stapling kit (ethicon endo-surgery inc., cincinnati, oh, usa) was opened and the circular anal dilator (cad) was gently introduced and fixed to the perianal skin with four cardinal sutures.A swab was inserted and gently pulled outward to visualize the apex of the intussusception.Finally, the transtar technique was performed in three steps: step 1: parachute suture placement, step 2: opening of the prolapse, and step 3: circumferential resection.Intraoperative complications included partial dehiscence of staple line (n=1) and spiraling of staple line (n=2).The partial dehiscence of the staple line in one patient required immediate additional suturing with no further surgical re-intervention.The spiraling of the staple line in two patients required conservative treatment by observation and oral antibiotic medication with no further surgical treatment.Postoperative complications included bleeding (n=5), urinary retention (n=2), and persistent pain (n=1).Prolonged persistent pain in one patient required removal of retained staples (agraphectomy).One patient with postoperative bleeding received conservative treatment, and in one patient the observed perirectal hematoma required surgical re-intervention.In three patients, self-limiting rectal bleeding was notified.Acute urinary retention occurred in two patients requiring interventions without anesthesia.In conclusion, transtar facilitated a tailored, real circumferential full-thickness rectal resection, leading to improved patient functional and quality of life outcomes at 12 months postoperatively.It represents a safe and effective treatment for ods in local clinical practice, although the sustainability of real-world results needs to be proven in the long-term follow-up.
|