• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BLUE BELT TECHNOLOGIES NAVIO SURGICAL SYSTEM AU; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BLUE BELT TECHNOLOGIES NAVIO SURGICAL SYSTEM AU; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number NPFS02070
Device Problems Application Program Problem: Parameter Calculation Error (1449); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Injury (2348)
Event Date 07/02/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that surgeon uses the kinematic alignment method for knees.Both femur and tibia were planned and executed as usual, however patient had no fixed flexion and some varus wear pre-op.After the planned cuts, there was over 20 degrees of fixed flexion.The data from the software also suggested the patient was severely valgus, which wasn't the case.The surgeon ended up taking an additional 5mm of distal femur which still did not fully correct this.Surgery was extended more than 30 minutes.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: a1, d10, h3: updated information.H11: b1, b2, b5.D4, g3, g4, h1, h6: corrected information.
 
Event Description
It was reported that, during a navio-assisted tka surgery, although the surgeon uses the kinematic alignment method for his knees, both femur and tibia were planned and executed as usual; however, the results were different from planning.The patient showed little varus wear and no fixed flexion pre-op; however, after the cuts she presented with over 20 degrees of fixed flexion.The data from the software also suggested that the patient was severely valgus, which was not the case.It had to be cut an additional 5mm distal femur to correct this problem.Surgery was extended more than 30 minutes.The patient outcome is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was used in the treatment and case screenshots were returned.Dhr review found that the software version has been validated.A complaint history review found similar reports, this issue will continue to be monitored.This is an identified failure mode within the risk file.The surgical technique for tka (500095) provides instructions for implant planning and system usage.The case screenshots were reviewed and it was found that the full rom gap screen showed that 15 degrees of fixed flexion contracture was described.The overall alignment was 0 degrees, which is the expected alignment of the long leg axis.Since the values are taken from hip to ankle center, this aligns the leg to be straight, even if the gaps are tilted.The first plan by the user was tight medially and the gaps were around -5.4, full extension could not be achieved.Typically, the solution, in this case, would be to take more distal femur bone.The user cuts the tibia, lowered the tibia implant, cut, refined, and burred, which is also a correct way of achieving the desired result.It was reported that the surgeon took an additional 5mm of bone to correct that the patient was in valgus.The screenshots showed that the implant was adjusted by 5 clicks, which is 2.5mm more bone.After the adjustment, the final position of the implant was so that gaps were 0-1mm.This adjustment also resolved around 5 degrees of flexion contracture.The joint was balanced by changing the valgus of the femur.The screenshots show that an iterative planning method was used to tension the joint.It is imperative to consider the amount of distal resection so that there is not too much tightening of the joint.In this case, the navio system performed within expected parameters, but the surgeon's expectation of the system did not align with the actual capabilities of navio.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.The clinical/medical investigation found that based solely on the engineering evaluation, surgeon expectations versus navio limitations contributed to the reported events.The patient impact was most likely limited to the 30-60 minute surgical extension during which the flexion contraction was improved by iterative cutting with no patient injury reported beyond the >30 min extension and some possible residual valgus per the report.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NAVIO SURGICAL SYSTEM AU
Type of Device
ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BLUE BELT TECHNOLOGIES
2905 northwest blvd ste 40
plymouth MN 55441
MDR Report Key8824459
MDR Text Key152160843
Report Number3010266064-2019-00105
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K191223
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/28/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberNPFS02070
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/02/2019
Initial Date FDA Received07/24/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/23/2020
08/28/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/26/2020
08/28/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-